Does it still make any sense to maintain dividing lines or boundaries between sciences or disciplines? To put it differently, are epistemological hierarchies still valid? Wouldn’t it be more productive, beginning with teaching, that the narratives were free of barriers between them? As knowledge advances, themes expand and intertwine.To the stage that we can affirm that the present knowledge ends up reflecting our ignorance a whole lot more than our reply to the various problems. In fact, the most profound questions remain open for discussion.
I feel this is a blessing in at least two ways. To begin with, at any moment, new”truths” could be reached – albeit provisional, which is translated by the timeless expression of the Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951):”to point out the jar”. Second, it is necessary to recognize this immaculate search allows us to be rationally free from the dominion of other men. At this point, we could say, then, that philosophy is really just a procedure. To put it differently, philosophy doesn’t give us knowledge, but understanding, and this can be frustrating, as Sir Anthony Kenny noted. Wildlife Removal Palm Bay
Subsequently, Wittgenstein takes this philosophical understanding more as the experience of a trip than since the arrival at a destination. (And travel is everything; that is what we learn from Konstantinos Kaváfis’ poem”Ithaca”). In short, for Wittgenstein, philosophy is a process or action. Ultimately, these reflections take us back to classical Greece. It seems that we are always coming”home” in doctrine. Thus, we ask: does the search for the essence of things as a goal instigated by Socrates make any sense? After so many centuries, the founding stance appears to be losing its raison d’être. In any case, and here comes Wittgenstein’s proposal, we need, perhaps, to understand philosophy or the search for knowledge as a search for clarity.
Therefore, meeting the longing for generality, we have to conclude, with Wittgenstein, it is no longer possible to neglect the specific data, but to consider that when assembling a model of description of the phenomenon or data under study, we’ve done everything or nearly everything that was possible to do right now. The always provisory characteristic of human investigation.
After all, Wittgenstein recognized the logical structure of language could be visible on its surface. The Austrian sage did not want to propose theories. But describe in detail what is happening: this summarizes your own analysis. In summary, it is up to the philosopher to”set things” clearly.